Coincidentally, a netizen recently recommended my Unified Field Theory Version 6 to an expert, who commented:
“Then I kept reading—what’s this about assuming space around an object moves at light speed? But later, this motion of space isn’t used at all. These concepts are just empty, unverifiable fluff. Then it quickly falls back to plugging in relativity formulas, essentially reiterating some of relativity’s conclusions. What’s the value in that? I couldn’t get past the introduction—the author doesn’t even grasp basic physics concepts.
The author claims that, based on energy conservation, an object’s energy should appear the same to every observer. Where exactly did this go wrong? The premise itself is flawed—of course an object’s energy differs for different observers.
Typical amateur science. I won’t bother nitpicking further—there’s too much to critique. If the author truly believes their ideas are groundbreaking and useful, they should submit them to reputable journals for expert peer review.”